« Linux DVR | Main | MP3 Player »

October 16, 2003

Music Downloads

Been investigating music download services. Here's what I've learned so far judging by a Google search on Music Download, here are the top listed services

MP3.com

The top site, a bunch of free MP3 downloads. Linkin Park for instance. Pretty amazing, I'm not sure I understand the revenue model. These look like unprotected MP3's to me. Looks like mainly new artists to me. The Day I Die by the way is a pretty good track. Fun perusing.

EMusic. This looks like the subscription part of MP3.com. Says they have 20,000 albums, but not the primary ones. No limits after download. These are just pure MP3s. 40 downloads per month for $9.99/month. Can't believe this is too popular, but interesting to see. Really too bad that it requires a credit card before you do anything. They use the classic trick of wait two weeks and then start billing, billing, billing.

Musicmatch Downloads.

This is $0.99 per track or $9.99 per album. Have a bunch of kind of hard to understand limitations that basically mean you can only use it on your PC because it is protected with Windows Media format. Other not so great thing is that a credit card is required before you can even preview:

Apple iTunes

It is easy to see why this service is so popular when you look at what else is out there. First they have a dedicated player (like Musicmatch), it autosyncs with iPods, so you don't spend your whole life trying to figure out what is where. The iPod and your PC have the same music (they can do this because of the big disk sizes).

Also, they are right on in payment methods. Most folks who want music don't have credit cards and there is no way a parent is going to give kids an unlimited credit card access. So they have gift certificates and stored value (the equivalent of prepay on cell phones). Also, they don't have a monthly subscription (unlike Rhapsody, but like Musicmatch).

Pretty standard user interface, but much cleaner since it is a client application. They have previews, related and special content, so the usual stuff. They did a nice job on search with relevance scoring, although it's interesting a search for "Madonna" turns up some obscure track from the lady of Detroit and then the next hit is Do it with Madonna by the Androids :-) Otherwise, it has got to be one of the best searches around.

The cool thing is that the main user interface is a database like screen where you can search and double click gets you to a preview immediately. The search corrects misspellings too a la google. They also do a good job on exclusive content.

Posted by rich at October 16, 2003 10:42 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.geekfishing.net/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/725

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Music Downloads:

» A very nice Music Download round-up from GigaOm
Geekfishing Blog has a pretty snazzy round-up of download services. It is not complete but it is fairly elaborate in what it has. It misses out on EMusic, Buy.com and Napster.... [Read More]

Tracked on October 26, 2003 07:43 AM

Comments

Yes, iTunes is great tool for all music lovers!
(I've heard that we might have to pay for mp3 files, near future. I know why, but it's terrible...)

Posted by: music posters at January 21, 2004 04:50 AM

Great site and information !

Posted by: midi klingeltoene at January 12, 2004 01:55 PM

Missed out this great one:

http://magnatune.com/

allows variable user pricing and standard bread and butter mp3s. No lockin or BS. Try it.

Posted by: name at November 16, 2003 01:02 PM

That's the problem with Google. It's close but not quite there and still requires some brute force analysis to get really good info. Of course you could always just get a professional analysis of the digital music space which lays it out for you...
Right now the top 3 are:
1. RealNetworks - 250K subs!
2. Apple iTunes - many, many downloads
3. Roxio/Napster - not as many downloads as iTunes but really similar service with a little bit better selection

Your exclusion of RealNetworks is somewhat perplexing. Do they not show up on Google? If not, why not and is that a problem for Google?

By the way, I have a sector report on the various music download services if you're interested. It's easier (and apparently more accurate) than Google.

Posted by: Jake Kaldenbaugh at November 11, 2003 09:55 PM

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?